I have
always loved promoting learning through questioning. This type of learning allows the student to
discover the knowledge inside themselves and pair it up with other
knowledge. It promotes a sense of
self-accomplishment when the student has been racking their brain and they
suddenly receive that “ah hah” moment.
One questioning technique is
divergent-thinking. These type of
questions are often open-ended questions.
For example, a question could be, “What can be done with improve ELL
vocabulary development?” These questions
are often broad and usually start with opinions. Then, the opinions influence research that
will eventually lead into an educated conclusion. They also promote debate and discussion,
which can be enlightening.
Another questioning technique,
opposite from divergent, is convergent-thinking. These questions are narrow in nature, as they
are asking for a specific answer to a specific question. The answers to these questions are typically factually
based; whereas, the divergent questions are more opinions could lead into facts
if developed enough.
Both technique can be effective, and
both can be used collaboratively. I
believe that divergent taps into more higher order thinking, and convergent
taps into more lower order thinking; both of which, however, are important.
Thank you, Cole:)
ReplyDeleteDivergent and convergent questions are very important! If a teacher can use them together it can be very beneficial to the students.
ReplyDelete