Typically,
in the middle school level, a teaching style is determined the characteristics
and experiences of the teacher. As I mentioned
above, two teaching styles that are commonly found are the traditional, or didactic,
and the facilitator, or constructivist, styles.
These two methods both attempt to promote student learning, but they go
about it in unique ways.
Traditional
teaching styles involve the use of lectures, competitive learning,
teacher-centered discussion, and linearly structured classroom. The characteristics of teachers who usually follow
this method are labeled as direct, formal, informative, prescriptive, and
dominative. As we can conclude from
these factors, the traditional teaching style is one that emphasizes learning
directly from the teacher, as the classroom is set up to face them, and it
involves a one-way channel of communication.
Facilitating
teaching styles involve the use of discussions, peer-to-peer learning, student
inquires, reciprocal teaching, and problem solving. The characteristics of teachers who usually
follow this method are labeled as democratic, indirect, informal, inquiring,
and reflective. This teaching style is
different because it focuses more on the student, as it looks to promote
learning through the interactions of the students.
With
any dichotomy, I always like to find a happy medium. I can see how a lecture from different can be
beneficial, and I can see how promoting learning through group discussion can
be as well. I believe the incorporation
of both strategies would provide for the most successful environment.
Thanks, Cole:)
ReplyDeleteAre there any sections directly from either the facilitating style or the traditional style that you could see yourself using in your own classroom? I agree that it most beneficial if you have an incorporation of both strategies in a classroom. Thank you for sharing!
ReplyDelete